Fathers should be helped and encouraged to work flexibly to reduce the impact that having children has on women’s careers, says think tank.
The Social Market Foundation (SMF) said that cultural barriers to men working part time contribute to mothers being forced into career choices that have long-term implications for their employment levels and wages.
In a new report, the SMF showed that ten years after having their first child, mothers work 9% fewer hours than fathers and are paid 19% less per month.
The root cause of that difference is the decision many women make to work part-time after having children, the SMF said. Three years after their last child is born, only 45 per cent of women work full time, while 92 per cent of men do. The median number of hours worked by mothers in employment falls from 37 to 25.
Fathers work longer hours after having children despite growing evidence that more men want to work less and spend more time caring for their children. Their median working week rises from 38 to 39 hours. Working longer may help men win promotions and wage increases that women working part time miss out on.
The report was published by James Kirkup, the SMF Director, who works part time. He said more men should be able to do the same.
Fathers working flexibly can be good for women’s careers and good for men, but too many men just don’t feel able to ask employers about working differently. That needs to change.
The SMF report analyses differences between mothers and fathers over a longer period and shows that the decision for mothers to work part-time has long-term consequences for their employment and wages over the rest of their lives.
Of those at work ten years after their first child was born, first-time mothers earn 11% less per hour, 19% less per month and work 9% fewer hours per week than first-time fathers.
SMF analysis shows that ten years after the birth of a first child, seven in ten (73%) of mothers and nine in ten (89%) of fathers are in work. Mothers predominantly work shorter hours, with six in ten (61%) employed on a part-time basis. By contrast, 97% of employed fathers work full-time.
Nicole Gicheva, SMF researcher, said:
The decision for women to work part-time after having a child can make sense for a family and no-one should try to dictate how parents should combine work and family. But it is also decision that can have far-reaching consequences for a woman’s employment and pay.
The consequences of those choices can disadvantage both women and men. Women miss out on work and pay, men miss out on time with their children. A better balance of work between the sexes could benefit everyone.”
As well as helping women work more and develop their careers, increasing the number of fathers working flexibly could meet a growing demand among men for a different approach.
More than a third (36%) of fathers report that they would take a pay cut to achieve a better work-life balance but fathers can feel uncomfortable requesting flexible work, especially where workplace culture equates professional ambition with a traditional full-time role. Survey evidence shows that fathers often find the culture in their workplace to be unsupportive of their wishes for more childcare responsibilities.
The SMF recommended policies including requiring employers to state on all job vacancy notices whether they are willing to consider part-time or flexible working arrangements.
James Kirkup said:
Sensible policies can nudge employers to be more open to flexible working for both sexes and celebrate those who do. But the real issue here is cultural: too many men worry that their employers won’t consider letting them change their working patterns to share childcare, and some are scared that they’ll be penalised for even asking.
Employers, business leaders and politicians need to help dismantle that cultural barrier by sending a clear message that men can succeed at work while playing a full part in their children’s lives. Helping more men to work flexibly would help both parents strike a better balance between work and childcare.
Article via City Women